Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf: Sourcegraph Cody is best for large codebases, Windsurf for agentic coding. Full breakdown on price, features, pros and cons below.
| Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $9/mo | $15/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Category | AI Coding Assistants | AI Coding Assistants |
| Best for | large codebases, enterprise dev, code search | agentic coding, refactoring, full-project work |
Entry prices; free tiers show as 0. Verify current pricing on each site.
Sourcegraph Cody
Assistant de code IA avec un contexte profond de la base de code.
$9/mo
Free tier available
- Codebase context
- Autocomplete
- Chat + commands
- Enterprise search
Avantages
- Great codebase context
- Free tier
- Enterprise-ready
Inconvénients
- Best value at scale
- Setup for self-host
Windsurf
Éditeur de code IA-native avec flux agentiques conscients de la base de code.
$15/mo
Free tier available
- Agentic flows
- Codebase awareness
- Inline completion
- Free tier
Avantages
- Strong agent mode
- Generous free tier
- Fast
Inconvénients
- Newer
- Editor switch required
Verdict: Sourcegraph Cody or Windsurf?
Sourcegraph Cody and Windsurf are both AI Coding Assistants tools, but they fit different users. Both have a free tier, so you can trial each at no cost before paying. On paid plans, Sourcegraph Cody has the lower entry price ($9/mo). Sourcegraph Cody's standout is great codebase context. Windsurf counters with strong agent mode. Bottom line: choose Sourcegraph Cody if you need large codebases; pick Windsurf for agentic coding.