Cursor vs Windsurf
Cursor vs Windsurf: Cursor is best for full-project coding, Windsurf for agentic coding. Full breakdown on price, features, pros and cons below.
| Cursor | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $20/mo | $15/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Category | AI Coding Assistants | AI Coding Assistants |
| Best for | full-project coding, refactoring, agentic dev | agentic coding, refactoring, full-project work |
Entry prices; free tiers show as 0. Verify current pricing on each site.
Cursor
Edytor kodu AI-first stworzony do agentowej edycji wielu plików.
$20/mo
Free tier available
- Codebase-aware chat
- Multi-file edits
- Agent mode
- Tab autocomplete
Zalety
- Powerful codebase awareness
- Fast agentic edits
- Free tier
Wady
- Can over-edit
- Costs add up with heavy use
Windsurf
Edytor kodu natywny dla AI z agentowymi przepływami świadomymi bazy kodu.
$15/mo
Free tier available
- Agentic flows
- Codebase awareness
- Inline completion
- Free tier
Zalety
- Strong agent mode
- Generous free tier
- Fast
Wady
- Newer
- Editor switch required
Verdict: Cursor or Windsurf?
Cursor and Windsurf are both AI Coding Assistants tools, but they fit different users. Both have a free tier, so you can trial each at no cost before paying. On paid plans, Windsurf has the lower entry price ($15/mo). Cursor's standout is powerful codebase awareness. Windsurf counters with strong agent mode. Bottom line: choose Cursor if you need full-project coding; pick Windsurf for agentic coding.